+ Reply to Thread
Results 121 to 132 of 132
-
07-21-2005 03:44 AM #1211dash1Guest
Hogeboom:
It seems that my answers are of no help. I'll withdraw.
-
07-21-2005 11:19 AM #122
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 23
Originally Posted by 1dash1
I'm just trying to get to the bottom of things, that's all. I feel like my situation isn't quite resolved, and so I keep prodding and prodding until that confused feeling goes away.
Gary Hill indicated in messages #9 & #13 that the Exception to Rule 24-2 prevented me from getting relief for a left-handed shot. However, the USGA disagreed with this.
I would like clarification on that.
So far, clarification has only come in the form of (and I'm paraphrasing here) "Different Rules Officials give different rulings" () and "The Exception to 24-2 only applies if you're deliberately circumventing the rules" ().
The whole thing just leaves me feeling
-
07-21-2005 11:41 AM #123Originally Posted by HogeboomIt could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others.
Colby
-
07-21-2005 01:56 PM #1241dash1Guest
Hogeboom:
Thanks. And I think you'll have to get your answer from the source.
Post script:
I humbly suggest terminating the line of inquiry regarding why different rules officials see things differently.
Focusing on the second question regarding the exception to Rule 24-2 would more quickly resolve your dilemma.Last edited by 1dash1; 07-21-2005 at 02:59 PM.
-
07-21-2005 04:59 PM #125
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Posts
- 23
Originally Posted by 1dash1
The Exceptions outlined in various USGA Decisions seem to fall into 2 categories:
1. Player invokes 24-2 to avoid unplayable lie. (e.g., Decision 24-2b/16, where the ball was stuck in tree roots)
2. Player takes abnormal stance solely to create interference. (e.g., Decision 24-2b/18.)
My situation falls into neither category. I decided that a left-handed shot was my best chance of advancing the ball forward. If such a shot is deemed to be "unnecessarily abnormal", then please tell me what, exactly, constitutes a reasonable, "normal" shot under these circumstances?
-
07-21-2005 07:50 PM #126Originally Posted by Hogeboom
It Depends!
Without being there and seeing the exact circumstances of the drop, the lie, your stance, the ability to swing a club a certain way, the movement of the clouds and the sun and the gravitational pull of the earth, etc, etc, it cannot be determined by a Rules Official in the manner that you are trying to get it done. There are a bunch of circumstances that need to be looked at at the time it is occurring. The USGA Rules person gave you the procedure to get it done next time, it's just to hard to get back to it in this instance and come up with the definitive ruling.It could be that the purpose of your life is only to serve as a warning to others.
Colby
-
07-21-2005 10:32 PM #127
♪♪♪ This is the thread that never ends, and it goes on and on my friends. Some people started typing it not knowing what it was. And they'll continue typing it forever, just because, this is the thread that never ends...♪♪♪
C'mon folks, sing it with me!When applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
09-02-2005 01:38 AM #128"Richard"Guest
so what was ever decided about this thread? Had it been tiger woods making the shot left handed he would have gotten relief from the cart path? But since it was a 40+ handicap he didn't get relief playing it left handed?
-
09-02-2005 02:25 AM #129Originally Posted by thotho
The answer has everthing to do with whether or not the player would play the shot left-handed IF the cart path were NOT there.
Is the player playing a left-handed stroke because that is necessary under the circumstances OR is the player chosing to play left handed (from a list of other options such as a backhanded sideways chip, right-handed punch out, etc.) because he thinks he will get a favourable ruling?
-
09-02-2005 03:37 AM #130"Richard"Guest
i thought in this case the player was playing left handed not because of the path but because of the fence...
-
09-02-2005 04:13 AM #131
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Location
- Liverpool
- Posts
- 1,340
But he was seeking relief from the path.
If the path was not there, would he have used a left handed stroke, is the defining question.
-
06-11-2006 04:38 AM #132
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 305
let me take a stab at this one
its a pet rule of mine ....
The balls on the fence side of the path ........so if the fence is close enuff to make a right handed shot impossible id have to play left handed , drop near the right hand side of the path "fairway side " then elect to play right handed , getting a 2nd drop further towards the fairway , then play a normal right handed shot
However , if the fence didnt make the right handed shot impossible the relief would be for a right handed shot , seeing me drop on the strip beside the fence , then id have to play left handed , and take the first 2 drops .....
wether you end up dropping 2 times or 3 ,you still end up fairway side playing right handed
be easier for the club to declare the path as the boundary on this hole huh........
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Relief from a cart path
By mpare in forum Rules Of GolfReplies: 12Last Post: 05-23-2007, 09:48 PM -
Nearest Point of Relief What Club to Use.
By BC MIST in forum Rules Of GolfReplies: 20Last Post: 04-05-2007, 01:34 AM -
Where to Take Relief From A Cart Path
By Kilroy in forum InstructionReplies: 0Last Post: 06-24-2005, 02:34 PM -
Nearest point of relief
By spidey in forum Rules Of GolfReplies: 1Last Post: 05-14-2003, 06:43 PM -
Club Used to determine Nearest Point of relief.
By natgolfer in forum Rules Of GolfReplies: 3Last Post: 08-12-2002, 04:34 PM