+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 46 of 46
-
10-22-2009 08:48 PM #31
-
10-22-2009 10:24 PM #32
-
10-22-2009 11:18 PM #33
-
10-23-2009 09:06 AM #34
-
10-23-2009 09:23 AM #35
-
10-23-2009 11:23 AM #36
-
10-23-2009 12:20 PM #37
Fair enough, but Jack still chose to use that ball. This is almost akin to saying that FIGJAM could have won more majors if he would have played it safe and not hit driver off of every tee or gone for every pin - all conscious decisions made by each player..........why you wouldn't give yourself the absolute BEST possible chance of winning?? I guess we should really be factoring in intelligence when we talk about what goes into making a player great.
Great fact on Jack though, I didn't know that
-
10-23-2009 12:35 PM #38
-
10-23-2009 12:35 PM #39
Megan Fox vs. Angelina Jolie
Proud member of the 2009 Ryder Cup winning team
-
10-23-2009 12:59 PM #40
-
10-23-2009 01:01 PM #41
It is interesting isn't it - Jack being tied to an inferior ball through an equipment deal - not sure why he didn't void the contract by playing something better at the time. Here's more background...
Frank Thomas, a former South African recently retired from the United States Golf Association after 26 years in the position of technical director.
Thomas developed and directed one of the most respected research and testing teams in golf and was responsible for having set the International Equipment Standards (IES), designed to protect the game, and which govern balls and clubs for the multi-billion dollar equipment industry.
Thomas is now working as technical advisor to the Golf Digest magazine.
Nicklaus, of course, is a great advocate of “reigning in the ball” to preserve the integrity of the game and, interviewed by Dale Hayes, Thomas revealed that he and his team had on occasion actually taken balls from the great man’s own stock for testing.
What they found defies belief. Far from getting an advantage from the MacGregor balls he was using, Nicklaus was, in fact, playing with one of the poorer balls tested.
Technicians found that the balls were often not spherical, that they did not go as far as some others and that they displayed quite serious deflection – in other words when hit by the “Iron Byron” machine developed to give a uniform strike they would fly either to the right or left and not end in a nice tight cluster.
www.chapeaunoirgolf.com
-
10-23-2009 01:19 PM #42
-
10-23-2009 01:28 PM #43
This excerpt was pulled from a story published in 2002, but it really hasn't had much play, although if you google 'Frank Thomas Macgregor ball Nicklaus', you'll get many instances returned.
I grew up with Jack still in his prime in the 70s, and always called him my favorite - Tiger is now my favorite, and I still think he's fantastic and will break Jack's records. It's amazing though to think had Jack played a ball other than the Macgregor Tourney during the 70s how many of those second place finishes in majors would have been wins. We can only speculate.www.chapeaunoirgolf.com
-
11-27-2009 05:40 PM #44
More on the inferior Macgregor ball from Golf Week.
www.chapeaunoirgolf.com
-
11-27-2009 06:04 PM #45
-
11-30-2009 10:34 PM #46
I didn't know that about Jack's golf balls either. Very interesting. Did he have a lot of shots go off target during rounds? Was he aware at the time the he was playing with inferiour equipment?
Also, in keeping with the theme of the thread....
Gretzky, Jordan, and Joe Montanna in their respective sports.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Canadian Open for debate
By Kilroy in forum Tour TalkReplies: 2Last Post: 06-03-2010, 04:45 PM -
An Age Related Debate - Actresses
By fundonny in forum Almost AnythingReplies: 25Last Post: 01-29-2008, 08:55 PM -
Fighting in hockey debate... again...
By golfisforfun in forum SportsReplies: 35Last Post: 11-19-2007, 06:35 AM -
PGA players debate how to pay caddies
By Kilroy in forum Tour TalkReplies: 0Last Post: 08-08-2007, 05:14 AM