Tiger has played in only 17 events this year and is well ahead of Vijay who has played 24 events, man can you imagine how much Tiger would have if he played in 24 events. My guess at least $12,000,000
Printable View
Tiger has played in only 17 events this year and is well ahead of Vijay who has played 24 events, man can you imagine how much Tiger would have if he played in 24 events. My guess at least $12,000,000
He needs all the times off for commercial shoots and selling products. (Estimated at $60 Millions +). So, if he plays more tournaments, that would actually be a pay cut to his total income :)
I know, but just say he played as many events what his total would beQuote:
Originally Posted by Eldred
I heard a rumour that Tiger has six toes on his right foot, but only five toes on his left foot. How much better would Tiger golf if he had six toes on both feet!
I don’t think Tiger would win as much. He is too intense to play that many tourneys a year. Less is more in his case…my 2 cents.
So much for those who said he will never dominate again. Good thing his putting was off in the two majors he didn’t win.
Other thing I noticed this weekend, so many people say that Tiger’s an A’hole but it seems that most guys on tour like Tiger. Go figure!
This would mean that in order to accomplish the "Tiger Slam", the next golfer must have at least six toes... :laughing:Quote:
Originally Posted by Colby
:laughing: :laughing: :thumbsdowQuote:
Originally Posted by Colby
I agree, but some of us here who don't know him just assume he's an a'hole :cheers :cheersQuote:
Originally Posted by mberube
If you are pointing fingers at me, I have never said Tiger is an a'hole. I said that I don't like him. Me. I never have disputed his talent. I don't like his antics on the golf course, and I think that his handlers have created a picture of perfection that isn't reality. And I really think that Tiger has an opportunity to be an even bigger influence on golf than he is today if he acted in real life the way that his commercials and public appearances make him to be.Quote:
Originally Posted by flagolfnut
Here we go again :footinmouQuote:
Originally Posted by Colby
Is there anything better to talk about? Every Tiger thread gets so much reaction.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chieflongtee
says the guy who started the thread...:rolleyesQuote:
Originally Posted by flagolfnut
Actually yes. Tell me about your worst and best shot yesterday.Quote:
Originally Posted by flagolfnut
My worst shot...Was at the Casino and lost at Sic BoQuote:
Originally Posted by Chieflongtee
My best shot...Got some well needed rest
Exciting huh? :rolleyes
That's because someone keeps posting meaningless crap about Tiger. Here let me finish it.Quote:
Originally Posted by flagolfnut
Tiger will win player of the year
Tiger will win the money title
Tiger will save some children from a burning building
Tiger will make peace in the Middle East
Tiger will cature Osama Bin Laden with a Nike Driver and a sand wedge
We have to put up with the crap on TV while we are trying to watch golf. Like Tiger is the ONLY person who could ever make a particular shot. Has Tiger made some amazing shots over the years? Yes. And so did Jack and Arnold and almost everyone who has won any number of golf tournaments.
And if Kenny Perry hadn't folded like a cheap tent, it was his tournament to win, and ultimately to lose, yesterday, not Tiger with a resounding 71.
Just imagine how much richer you'd be if you stayed away from that place :laughing: :laughing:Quote:
Originally Posted by flagolfnut
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colby
True however Jack says that many tournaments were not won by him but lost by others.
I can believe that. There have been "better" golfers than Perry that have fallen apart coming down the stretch including Greg Norman at the Masters once or twice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Chieflongtee
He also said that he was not the best ball striker of his time but one of the best at managing different courses. He often went to the 3 wood to be the first one to hit the 2nd shot and reaching the green first therefore putting pressure on his playing partners.
My definition of choking is a player completely losing it compared to the great plays of the majority of his competitors. Perry did not choke yesterday. The course was just nasty. Only a few players manage to score under par and none of those where very low. A winning score of –6 is not a walk in the park.Quote:
Originally Posted by Colby
Yeah but it's so nice with all the lights and bells, but seriously I would have saved slome money but in the end would have blown it on some other useles thingQuote:
Originally Posted by Chieflongtee
So you think Tiger's a super hero too?Quote:
Originally Posted by Colby
He also used to work for Esso :hyper:Quote:
Originally Posted by flagolfnut
:scratchchQuote:
Originally Posted by Chieflongtee
Either it is a sign of me getting old or you're too young.Quote:
Originally Posted by flagolfnut
...we're more familiar with Tony of the "frosted flakes" generation :)
Totally didn't click in...nice attachmentQuote:
Originally Posted by Chieflongtee
I agree, the course was tough. But Perry shot a 74 which tied him for high round in the top 25 finishers of the tournament. Only Stuart Appleby, with the help of a 2 stroke penalty thanks to his caddy, and Sergio Garcia managed to score that high. Perry averaged 67.7 for the first three rounds (70/69/64) and then shot the 74 on Sunday. Did he chock, I don't think he did, but he certainly came apart, with bogies on 9, 10, 12, 13, and 14.Quote:
Originally Posted by mberube
Just to help you out:Quote:
Originally Posted by flagolfnut
sar·casm http://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/g...4/JPG/pron.jpg ( P ) Pronunciation Key (särhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/g.../GIF/prime.gifkhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/g...GIF/abreve.gifzhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/g...GIF/lprime.gifhttp://cache.lexico.com/dictionary/g.../GIF/schwa.gifm)
n.http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=sarcasm&db=*
- A cutting, often ironic remark intended to wound.
- A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.
- The use of sarcasm. See Synonyms at wit<sup>1</sup>.
Thanks for the clarity of the word, I hope a little bit of sarcasm is O.K with you :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Colby
Assumption...just to help you out.
Assumption
3. The act of taking for granted: assumption of a false theory
4. Something taken for granted or accepted as true without proof, a supposition
5. Presumption; arrogance