Results 1 to 17 of 17
Thread: Reasonable Evidence
Threaded View
-
07-05-2007 04:55 PM #1
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Posts
- 4,163
Reasonable Evidence
Pretend that you are playing #17 or #18 at Mountain Creek where there are water hazards to the right of the holes, but not visible from the tee. You hit drives towards those areas but you cannot find your ball. Is the ball LOST, or is it in the hazard(s)?
What reasonable evidence does one need to be able to proceed under the water hazard rule?
Decision 26-1/1 is purposefully vague in its description of what reasonable evidence is and I was wondering if someone had come across something more definitive. I had a brief discussion with two Level 3 officials yesterday but still could get an exact answer.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Tilghman being tried by opinion, not evidence
By Kilroy in forum Tour TalkReplies: 49Last Post: 01-18-2008, 12:56 PM -
Presidents Cup is tangible evidence of Stricker turnaround
By Kilroy in forum Tour TalkReplies: 3Last Post: 09-26-2007, 11:25 AM -
Reasonable $$ for Limo/Car Service
By Bidou in forum Almost AnythingReplies: 5Last Post: 10-06-2006, 06:11 PM -
Reasonable Evidence?
By Kilroy in forum InstructionReplies: 0Last Post: 06-24-2005, 01:35 PM -
Reasonable Evidence 101
By Gary Hill in forum Rules Of GolfReplies: 4Last Post: 07-30-2001, 05:18 PM