+ Reply to Thread
Results 61 to 90 of 116
Thread: Michelle Wie
-
07-09-2005 02:52 PM #61
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- ottawa
- Posts
- 637
Originally Posted by LobWedge
It amazes me that people who golf could think she wouldn't. All of Andru's points are valid: she's 15, she scored better than a lot of PGA pros, she's got many years to improve, and she's done really well her FIRST TWO EVENTS ON A PGA TOUR...imagine if she participated in 50.
-
07-09-2005 03:15 PM #62Originally Posted by flagolfnut
-
07-09-2005 03:17 PM #63
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Gatineau
- Posts
- 346
Originally Posted by Golfpeasant
-
07-09-2005 03:47 PM #64Originally Posted by GolfpeasantWhen applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
07-09-2005 05:20 PM #65Originally Posted by flagolfnut
-
07-09-2005 05:48 PM #66Originally Posted by mpare
I'll be right there cheering for her if she earns her way on tour. I feel that right this minute she is not there yet, and is doing a great disservice to women's golf by not devoting more time to the LPGA Tour. There are a lot of young women and girls that aspire to play there. Annika still aspires to play there. Why shouldn't Michelle Wie? We all know that she wants to play on the men's tour. Why not use the LPGA as a practice ground, if she's that good? On the PGA Tour she's nothing more than a curiosity right now.When applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
07-09-2005 05:54 PM #67On the PGA Tour she's nothing more than a curiosity right now
-
07-09-2005 06:02 PM #68Originally Posted by Dan Kilbank
For the same reason that the PGA Tour raised it's minimum age to 18 for qualifying (the Ty Tryon rule), as well as the NHL, NBA, NFL, etc. These kids are gettng chewed up and spit out at the expense of corporate and personal greed.When applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
07-09-2005 06:27 PM #69
Can't argue with that. Good point Lobbie. I had not thought much about the fact that the corporate bean counters can abuse her popularity.
However her viability as a PGA player is still valid.
BTW Green rules
-
07-09-2005 06:54 PM #70Originally Posted by Dan Kilbank
Originally Posted by Dan KilbankWhen applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
07-09-2005 07:41 PM #71Originally Posted by powerlefty
Thank you.
-
07-09-2005 07:58 PM #72"Richard"Guest
I wonder if they will have to "Michelle proof" the courses on the LPGA tour in a few years. They did it for tiger, and she is much more impressive compared to the women pros than tiger was compared to the men back when he was 15. Does that mean she is going to be better than Anika? I think so but only time will tell.
You know what would be AMAZING... If she won the amatuer even coming up next week because in winning that you get an invite to the masters. I'm sure Hootie Johnson would love that. But she has no chance to win that tourney either.
I still have no idea who Ty Tryon is
-
07-09-2005 08:12 PM #73I still have no idea who Ty Tryon is
-
07-09-2005 08:18 PM #74
Could we say that Ty is golf's A Daigle?.
Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.
Mahatma Gandhi
-
07-09-2005 08:36 PM #75"Richard"Guest
wow, did some reading. Read some articles from before he started to suck and they were saying he would be the one to push tiger and even beat him more than not!!! But wie is still an amateur and says she is going to college, going to be college golf and not rush into anything. Hope she is going to stick with it because it sounds like the right way to go.
I deffo not turning pro man!!! Going to stay an amateur forever like bobby jones. Speaking of which, if anyone has TMN on demand, they just added the bobby jones movie, check it out. Its really good
-
07-09-2005 08:43 PM #76
Yes grasshoper. Now go hug your clubs and repeat the mantra... "It's only a game" several hundred times.
Thotho, you are a real "keener".
-
07-09-2005 08:45 PM #77"Richard"GuestOriginally Posted by Chieflongtee
-
07-10-2005 12:34 AM #78AndruGuestOriginally Posted by Dan Kilbank
-
07-10-2005 09:55 AM #79
- Join Date
- Apr 2002
- Location
- Kanata
- Posts
- 468
[QUOTE=LobWedge]. But do it through Monday qualifying or take your shot at Q-school like everyone else. QUOTE]
Then we should kick Tiger off the tour and send him to Q school and make him Monday qualify because he never did either of these.
Can you believe it, the world's greatest player now actually "snuck" onto the tour through sponsor's exemptions. He made enough money (and I believe, won an event) in the events following his last US Amateur win so he NEVER WENT TO Q-SCHOOL. And HE NEVER MONDAY QULIFIED ANYWHERE. Oh, and by the way after he got his Tour exemption he then snubbed an event the next week (Milwaukee I think) by not showing up to use his sponsor's exemption.
-
07-10-2005 10:27 AM #80
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- ottawa
- Posts
- 637
Originally Posted by flagolfnut
Actually, its because she's 15. From what I've seen, her problem is experience, not skill ... every time she's in contention for something, she "greg norman's" a bit. In contention for women's US open, 15, amateur. In contention to make cut at 2nd PGA event ever, 15, amateur.
Guys, give me a break. This sounds so sexist, its hilarious. "Stick to the PGA, theres an LPGA and PGA for a reason." LOL. Thats right. There were whites only for a reason too.
-
07-10-2005 02:43 PM #81
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Gatineau
- Posts
- 346
Originally Posted by Golfpeasant
-
07-10-2005 04:48 PM #82
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Location
- ottawa
- Posts
- 637
SInce discussion is subjective, what I'm hearing SOUNDS sexist to me. Prejudice can white, gender or anything based on "pre judgement". Thats what I'm talking about, and its not off topic.
-
07-10-2005 05:27 PM #83AndruGuestOriginally Posted by Golfpeasant
She's getting a chance to play and learn from the best and the sponsors are filling their seats. It's a win win for both parties. I still don't get why this is such a big deal to some people.
-
07-10-2005 06:04 PM #84BarnieGuestOriginally Posted by flagolfnut
BTW I have no idea what the answer is but what place did the other exemption players come in?
-
07-10-2005 09:36 PM #85
[QUOTE=powerlefty]
Originally Posted by LobWedge
It's a little bit different, Tiger had won three straight US Amateurs and basically dominated college golf. Michelle has won next to nothing, aside from a womens publinx tournament. That should get her into LPGA events for sure, but mens events, I don't think so.
And after he got his win, he didn't really need a sponsors exemption.
-
07-10-2005 09:43 PM #86AndruGuest
[QUOTE=wopstergolf]
Originally Posted by powerlefty
-
07-10-2005 09:50 PM #87
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- XXXXXXXXXXXX
- Posts
- 4,215
Everyone Is Missing The Main Point Here
It seems that a lot of people are missing the main point here. I said it once, I'll say it again.
If I am a PGA Tour Event Sponsor and I think Michelle Wie can help sell tickets to my event then I am inviting her to my event. Bottom Line, I need to sell tickets and if the Big 5 are not entered then why not invite her? She draws a crowd, she can golf. It is not like she is a 15 handicap hack. She can play the game.
Comparing her to Woods or anyone else on the PGA Tour is a waste of print. Saying she doesn't belong in a PGA Event is a waste of print. The way I look at it, anyone outside the Top 100 on the money list do not belong on the PGA Tour. But they are there and allowed to enter tournaments.
Come on guys get over the fact that Michelle Wie will continue to be invited to PGA Events. Whether she plays in them is entirely up to her to decide.
BOTTOM LINE? $$$$$ CHA CHING, MONEY TALKS.
My opinions are my own, I do not follow others.
-
07-10-2005 10:56 PM #88Originally Posted by Golfbum
Now what kind of Tour is ideal for you then?
-
07-10-2005 11:16 PM #89AndruGuest
Hmmm maybe anyone in the top 100??
-
07-11-2005 06:21 AM #90
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- XXXXXXXXXXXX
- Posts
- 4,215
Top 100
Ideal Tour? Anyone in the Top 100 retains his card. Anyone from 100-125 is automatically in the finals at Q School.
Let's face it, there is enough money on tour now that if you perform well you can easily stay in the Top 100. If you can't earn enough to stay there then back to Q School.
My opinions are my own, I do not follow others.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Michelle Wie Posts a 64
By mpare in forum Tour TalkReplies: 3Last Post: 09-12-2010, 09:01 PM -
Michelle Wie a choker?
By Ginker in forum Tour TalkReplies: 46Last Post: 06-13-2006, 10:44 AM -
Michelle Wie 5up through 9
By kevmcm in forum Tour TalkReplies: 22Last Post: 07-15-2005, 10:08 AM -
Michelle Wie
By Golfbum in forum Tour TalkReplies: 35Last Post: 06-28-2005, 03:54 PM