+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 30 of 44
Thread: Overlly Complicated?
-
05-19-2005 11:16 AM #172 DivotsGuest
Overlly Complicated?
I certainly do not want to offend anyone with what I am about to say, but I think it must be said. I have been playing for many years and have always had a decent understanding of the rules of golf. However, recently I have taken a much bigger interest in gaining a greater understanding of all the rules of golf and, therefore have been reading the rule book on a consistent basis.
With all this being said, it seems to me that the rules of golf are much more complicated than they need to be (particularlyl for non-tournament golf). Would it not make sense to standardize penalty strokes (e.g., make every infraction one-stroke) for example? Perhaps part of the complication is that solely knowing the rules is not enough to fully understand them as the interpretation of the rules is just as important.
I love the integrity aspect of golf and the character-building result of calling penalties on yourself. However, I think there would be much less unconscious violation of rules if they were easier to understand and interpret.
Am I way off base here?
-
05-19-2005 11:36 AM #2
You are not the only one who thinks this, and it comes up very frequently.
In fact the latest revision of the rule book, which happens every 4(?) years, did try to simplify them somewhat. It's a hard thing to do because both the USGA and the R&A have to agree.
-
05-19-2005 11:58 AM #3Originally Posted by 72 Divots
Many people would agree there are too many rules, and they are too confusing. When my buddies & I are playing we basically use the rules we think apply & scrap the dumb ones - e.g. we allow moving a ball out of fairway divot, or the tamping down of ANY marks that might be in your line when putting.
The only rule that must be followed is that you enjoy your round of golf!
-
05-19-2005 12:37 PM #4
That’s the great thing about golf. Amateur or professional, tournament or non-tournament. Golf is golf. The rules apply the same to everyone.
As I see it, the reason that a 2 stroke penalty is applied when you break a rule is to differentiate from those times where you don’t break a rule but are also not entitled to a freebee to get yourself out of trouble (water hazard, OB, etc.). Remember, the ball is playable as it lies anywhere within the boundaries of the golf course (under water, among rocks, etc.), except as specified in the rules. As well, a 2 stroke penalty effectively removes par from the equation. Too bad, so sad. A player should not be able to “profit” by circumventing the rules.
Also remember that unlike other sports, each playing field is different from every other, so the rules need to be more open to interpretation (see Decisions) to account for the unique situations that arise.When applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
05-19-2005 12:37 PM #5Originally Posted by 72 Divots
I've played hockey, football, baseball/softball, and broomball in my lifetime, and I never read a single page of any rulebook in those sports while I played them. I didn't need to. If I broke the rules (and got caught), there was always somebody else who knew the rules to make the call.
In golf, YOU make that call. So you gotta read the rulebook if you want to be sure you make the right call. If "making the right call" is not that important to you, and you just want to rely on your own sense of what is "fair" because you're just playing a fun round, then that's fine too. Frankly, that's what most golfers do.[COLOR=green][B]Golf is a game invented by the same people who think music comes out of bagpipes.[/B][/COLOR]
-
05-19-2005 01:52 PM #6
I'm still baffled by the "logic" that you can't or don't have fun while playing within the rules. The real joy in the game for me is the challenge of trying to produce a great result from a less-than-perfect situation.
So your ball rolled in to an old divot. Big deal, you hit it there. Someone didn't come running out of the trees and put it there. What about the cleat and ball marks you leave behind for the next group? How in the world are you supposed to get any better if you don't learn to play the ball from those situations? You might as well just tee your ball up everywhere and pick up when you reach the green.When applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
05-19-2005 02:08 PM #7Originally Posted by LobWedge
I agree that for most situations, divots, ball marks, OB, etc. the rules are pretty simple and you should really just suck it up and hit the ball.
However, I also feel that many of the rules can be somewhat confusing, especially regarding when and how to properly take relief.
Could the rules be made simpler? Yes. Would they be the same as today? No. I'm sure some changes would benefit the player and others would not.
-
05-19-2005 02:19 PM #8Originally Posted by jvincent
http://www.rcga.org/english/RCGAStor...tem.asp?ID=298
Originally Posted by jvincentWhen applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
05-19-2005 06:36 PM #9
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 72
Originally Posted by LobWedge
It was brought up in a different thread awhile back that a sand filled divot is ground under repair and you get relief, but an unfilled divot is not and you must play it as it lies. Not sure if this is correct or not, but even so a filled divot with a ball in it you can still make reasonable contact, but down in an unfilled divot you cannot. And everyone is suppose to replace or fill their divots. So you get penalized a stroke because a previous player did not do what he was suppose to do. Perhaps not filling a divot should be a two stroke penalty?
-
05-19-2005 09:23 PM #10Originally Posted by LobWedge
Off the top of my head, I'd probably simplify water hazards, i.e. no difference between regular and lateral to simplify the dropping situations. If I were to to flip through it I'm sure I'd find some more.
-
05-19-2005 10:53 PM #11Originally Posted by HiG4s
You can't penalize someone for not repairing a divot hole. On courses with bermuda grass, for instance, you're not supposed to replace divots because they don't grow back in.
Originally Posted by jvincentWhen applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
05-20-2005 05:39 AM #12Originally Posted by 72 Divots
Originally Posted by 72 Divots
Originally Posted by 72 Divots
Give me an example of a Rule that you think needs interpretation and I will "walk you through it" to prove my point.
-
05-20-2005 08:34 AM #13Originally Posted by LobWedge
-
05-20-2005 08:50 AM #1472 DivotsGuest
Your arguement makes sense Gary particulalry regarding the punishment fitting crime. However, I'm not sure I agree that you can fully understand the rules without understanding the decisions. Do these decsions not relate to how the rules are applied - particularly in those rare situations where rule application is not so straight forward?
-
05-20-2005 09:48 AM #15Originally Posted by jvincent
A water hazard is different from a lateral water hazard.
Each have their OWN definitions and options for dropping.
-
05-20-2005 09:56 AM #16
- Join Date
- Dec 2004
- Posts
- 72
Rule 27-1. What if the course marshal says you are taking too long and will not let you go back to the tee box after a lost ball that you did not play a provisional because you thought you knew right where it was? Is the spot you are looking now the closest possible place to the previous spot and a one stroke penalty, or a violation of rule 27-1 and a two stroke penalty?
-
05-20-2005 09:59 AM #17Originally Posted by 72 Divots
The Rules of Golf are written in such a way that these decisions need not be read, known, or understood by the player in order for him to play the game and comply with the Rules.
That is why I challenged you to give me an example of a Rule that needs interpretation.
-
05-20-2005 10:07 AM #18Originally Posted by HiG4s
-
05-20-2005 10:09 AM #1972 DivotsGuest
With the greatest of respect Gary, I fully expect that you would be able to walk me through pretty much every conceivable situation I could run into on the course (thus I concede your challenge). I guess my point is that the vast majority of people do not possess your knowledge of the rules and that for weekend hackers, some of the rules can be confusing and difficult to fully understand. I can refer to my rule book when such confusing situations arise, however I suspect the people playing behind me would not be so appreciative of my attempt to follow the rules to a tee. Fore!!!
-
05-20-2005 10:25 AM #20Originally Posted by Gary Hill
I was actually replying to LobWedge, since he specifically referred to red stakes, i.e. a lateral hazard, and didn't list all the options for dropping.
-
05-20-2005 10:59 AM #21
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 29
Golf is the only game that I know of where the fan at home can effect the income of a player.ie Tiger woods 2 stroke penatly
Here is a sport where the number 1 player in the world breaks a rule and does not know that he did .nor, does his caddy or the playing partner.
Or the marshall that is close by.
These people play golf for a living if the rules were simple like most other sports you would think they would know them inside out.
I quess the best view of the rules that I have heard is from the Little Red book in which players were discussing whether or not to play winter rules
Harvey's response was its golf just play it as it lies
-
05-20-2005 11:25 AM #22Originally Posted by 72 Divots
Lets take a ball on a bridge as an example.
A general understanding of the definition of water hazard tells you that a water hazard extends vertically upward. Just knowing this one definition is enough for you to know that a bridge above a water hazard is IN the hazard.
If you have a general understanding of Rule 13-4, you would know that there are ONLY 3 actions that are prohibited before making a stroke at a ball which lies in a hazard.
1. Testing the condition of the hazard.
2. Touching the ground in a hazard or touching the water in a water hazard.
3. Touching or moving a loose impediment in a hazard.
You now know everything you need to know.
Can I play the ball off the bridge? Of course, you can ALWAYS play your ball as it lies.
Do I get free relief? No. Your ball is in the hazard.
Can I ground my club on the bridge? Yes. You are not testing the hazard or touching the water.
-
05-20-2005 11:32 AM #23Originally Posted by davemiddle
Marshals are outside agencies whose sole purpose is to manage the flow of traffic for players and spectators.
Asking for a ruling from a marshal is the same as asking a spectator for a ruling.
-
05-20-2005 11:41 AM #24Originally Posted by jvincentWhen applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
05-20-2005 11:56 AM #25Originally Posted by LobWedge
If the rule for all water hazards were "Drop within two club lengths not nearer the hole from point of entry OR replay from last spot." would that not be even simpler?
-
05-20-2005 12:13 PM #26Originally Posted by jvincentWhen applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
05-20-2005 12:22 PM #27Originally Posted by jvincent
-
05-20-2005 12:34 PM #28Originally Posted by LobWedge
I didn say it would make play faster, just the rules would be simpler.
Note there isn't anything preventing you from hitting a provisional from the tee for a ball that may be in the water in my rules.
-
05-20-2005 12:37 PM #29Originally Posted by Gary Hill
That would be a scenario where the rules work to your advantage.
-
05-20-2005 12:47 PM #30Originally Posted by jvincentWhen applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)