+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 20 of 20
Thread: shaft Frequency
-
03-02-2005 02:15 PM #1
shaft Frequency
Question - What exactly is the relevance of shaft frequency? Why would I want a highter or lower shaft freq.?
Thanks
-
03-02-2005 04:55 PM #2
Same as Regular flex, stiff flex, xtra stiff flex. Higher shaft frequency means stiffer. A noodle would have a very low frequency while a steel rod would have a very high frequency.There is more to it than that but for now let's leave it at that.
-
03-03-2005 09:15 AM #3
-
12-27-2005 09:27 PM #4
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 3
How would these modifications effect CPM (roughly, maybe?)
-one additional gram in headweight
-one inch of tip trimming?
-one inch of butt trimming?
-
12-27-2005 09:34 PM #5
Wouldn't any trimming make it shorther and therefore make it stiffer? I can't see how 1 gram would affect things but I would assume it would make it softer?
-
12-27-2005 09:39 PM #6Originally Posted by dbleberLive as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.
Mahatma Gandhi
-
12-28-2005 05:51 PM #7
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 3
Let me ask the same question another way: How much additional head weight is needed to decrease the CPM by 10? How much (in inches) for tip and butt trimming to increase the CPM by 10? I guess these relationships are not linear, but any rough numbers?
-
12-28-2005 07:05 PM #8
All shafts are not alike but you'll find your answers here:
http://www.tutelman.com/golfclubs/frequency.php?ref=Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.
Mahatma Gandhi
-
12-28-2005 07:13 PM #9
shaft frequency
Just a quick question since I traded for The Saint's Hogan's frequency matched irons. When all the irons are the same frequency, they should all feel the same right? And if they are all the same frequency, does it mean that I can play them from the same position in my stance or I still have to move the ball up and down my stance depending on which iron I am hitting (ie a 9 iron compared to a 6)?
Thanks
Claude
-
12-28-2005 07:19 PM #10Originally Posted by echansue
34 gram will decrease it by 12 cpm.Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.
Mahatma Gandhi
-
12-28-2005 07:21 PM #11Originally Posted by challengegolf
http://www.tutelman.com/golfclubs/WhyMoi.php?ref=
I believe your irons are also MOI matched(same force required to swing all clubs)Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.
Mahatma Gandhi
-
12-28-2005 07:31 PM #12
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Posts
- 3
Originally Posted by Chieflongtee
-
12-28-2005 07:36 PM #13Originally Posted by challengegolfLive as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.
Mahatma Gandhi
-
12-28-2005 07:40 PM #14Originally Posted by echansueLive as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.
Mahatma Gandhi
-
12-28-2005 07:57 PM #15
Frequency
It's OK Andre as my frequency was close to the one that the Saint had. I am between a stiff and reg flex so these irons should fit me well. I was just curious as I thought that I read or heard that if all the irons were at the same frequency then you could play them all from the same position in your stance (ie in the middle of your stance) which made the guessing for the right position in your stance out of the way.
Thanks
Claude
-
12-28-2005 10:06 PM #16
My understanding is that "club length" plays a larger part in proper ball position since since the longer clubs "bottom out" more forward in your stance.
Jim
-
12-29-2005 09:49 AM #17
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Posts
- 4,163
Originally Posted by challengegolf
If the clubs are MOI matched, say using Tom Wishon's MOI matching software, then they are matched to your "favourite"*** club, and therefore all clubs should be played from the ball position of THAT club, AND, they will likely feel the same when swung at the ball. When you waggle these clubs, you will definitely realize that they do not FEEL the same as the long irons will feel light and the short irons heavy, as the swingweight (unimportant) of MOI matched clubs becomes progressively heavier as they move to the shorter irons.
*** IMO, instead of asking the player what his FAVOURITE iron is, I ask, "With what iron do you consistently hit your best shots and feels the best when you swing?" My favourite clubs are my driver and my E-5 Hogan SW. I did not match my iron set to either of these clubs.
You mention that you are between "stiff and regular." These terms apply to a traditionally matched set of clubs whose frequencies increase by about 4 cpm's as they move from long irons to short irons. With MOI matched clubs you have to throw out the terms stiff, regular, senior, ladies and x stiff, as they are meaningless. Your MOI matched clubs are "all" of these, or at least cover a wide range of flexes. If a normal set increases by 4 cpm's then a 9 iron set has a frequency range of 32 cpms. Your long irons are very flexible and your short ones very stiff. Does this make sense to do? Your SFM clubs have a range of 0 cpm's. So comparing SFM to traditional, your long irons are stiff(S), your mid irons regular(R) and your short irons senior(A). This comparison, however, should not be done.
From my readings, golfers who swing each club with the same effort or force, whose top of the backswing to impact time is close to being the same, would benefit from MOI matching. If your short irons have a short backswing while your longer clubs have a much longer backswing, so that the time to impact varies a lot, then swingweight matched clubs may be the way to go.
As I am always striving for consistency, I use MOI matched clubs and I give my longer irons the same effort as the short ones on full swings, and having the same ball position for all irons, eliminates the guesswork of the varying ball positions for SW matched clubs. IMO, traditional clubs are MISMATCHED as the shafts all have different frequencies and they all have different MOI's. Yes, the swingweights should be matched, but swingweight is a relatively meaningless factor in the club's performance, except that the clubs feel the same when you are NOT swinging them.
-
12-29-2005 10:11 AM #18
[QUOTE=BC MIST] So comparing SFM to traditional, your long irons are stiff(S), your mid irons regular(R) and your short irons senior(A). This comparison, however, should not be done.
QUOTE]
Was that a typo?Live as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.
Mahatma Gandhi
-
12-29-2005 11:43 AM #19
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Posts
- 4,163
Originally Posted by Chieflongtee
If I single frequency match the clubs to say my "favourite" club, the 7 iron, all clubs will have a frequency of 319 cpm's. This includes my 3 iron which will now be 319, whereas before it would have been 303. So now, the 3 iron is STIFFER than traditional (319 to 303) and my shortest iron will be more flexible than before. (319 to 336)
Does this make sense, or have I missed something here?
-
12-29-2005 12:14 PM #20Originally Posted by BC MISTLive as if you were to die tomorrow. Learn as if you were to live forever.
Mahatma Gandhi
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
WTB: Frequency Analyzer
By stone_bone in forum Components & ToolsReplies: 0Last Post: 04-14-2012, 12:22 PM -
Help, looking for a Royal Precision Rifle 6 iron shaft in 6.0 frequency!!
By luigicactus in forum Components & ToolsReplies: 5Last Post: 04-26-2009, 11:53 AM -
UST Frequency Filtered Flare Tip putter shaft
By Demonts in forum Components & ToolsReplies: 3Last Post: 04-23-2009, 04:02 PM -
Shaft frequency device
By Prof. Jim Hlade in forum Club Making & ComponentsReplies: 44Last Post: 01-26-2006, 06:22 PM -
Frequency
By John in forum Club Making & ComponentsReplies: 3Last Post: 05-10-2004, 06:11 PM