+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 30 of 52
Thread: Solheim Cup
Hybrid View
-
08-19-2009 02:50 PM #1
Solheim Cup
The Solheim is being contested this week. Lest you think that the ladies don't play exciting golf, think again. These matches should be first rate. Let's hope that some of their competitive fires rub off on those of us who will be in Belleville next week. If that is not enough to entice you to tune in, have a look at these USA team photos on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/album.php?ai...4&l=498b7d9c92 Wow.
-
08-19-2009 03:52 PM #2
Caught a bit of the Captain's press conferences this afternoon.
Looks liek it will be fun week for sure. Gotta luv team events!!I've spent most of my life golfing .... the rest I've just wasted"
www.nationalcapitalgolftour.com
-
08-19-2009 04:05 PM #3
Mainstream publicity fail. I had no idea the Solheim Cup was this week.
www.chapeaunoirgolf.com
-
08-19-2009 04:08 PM #4
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- XXXXXXXXXXXX
- Posts
- 4,215
-
08-20-2009 09:02 AM #5
-
08-19-2009 04:54 PM #6
Golf channel is not mainstream GB.
Donny Vantage NFL Guru, since 1974
Money won is twice as sweet as money earned
-
08-19-2009 05:50 PM #7
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- XXXXXXXXXXXX
- Posts
- 4,215
Come on Donny. every cable company carries TGC. How can you say it is not mainstream?
Then again I work in the golf business so maybe that is why I am more aware of it than most of the members of this forum. I am sure others who are involved with golf as a business knew about the Solheim Cup.
For those who want to learn more about the Solheim Cup.
The least I can do on my last post on the subject.
Last edited by Golfbum; 08-19-2009 at 06:07 PM.
My opinions are my own, I do not follow others.
-
08-19-2009 06:36 PM #8
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- Ottawa
- Posts
- 1,076
Not intended to knock anyone, but aren't you a course ranger/marshal? I wouldn't equate that with the "golf business." However, if you work in the proshop, I stand corrected.
And I can vouch for anyone who lives in Ottawa that Golf Channel isn't part of the regular cable lineup...shameful !!!
-
08-19-2009 08:37 PM #9
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- XXXXXXXXXXXX
- Posts
- 4,215
As Dan says, rangers, etc are part of the golf industry.
For your information so you know in the future. I work in the Club Storage Area of the club. I also work as a starter at that course.
I also work part time in a golf retail store.
So I guess that counts as working in the golf business. Since I talk to golfers 4 days a week while working and another couple of days a week while golfing with them.
My opinions are my own, I do not follow others.
-
08-19-2009 08:45 PM #10
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- Ottawa
- Posts
- 1,076
-
08-19-2009 06:10 PM #11
Gotta pay extra for TGC with Rogers. Haven't had the golf channel for about 3 years
-
08-19-2009 06:55 PM #12
I'd disagree with your contention that marshals and backshop workers are not in the golf business. At the very least they are working in the industry and that is part of the business. Certainly they would be more involved in discussions around all aspects of golf than someone working in another environment.
Life dinnae come wit gimmies so yuv got nae chance o' gitt'n any from me.
-
08-20-2009 09:00 AM #13
Back to my earlier point though, I should have been a bit clearer in regard to my definition of mainstream media - I'm talking about your morning paper, your sport highlight show of choice, your major media bookmarks. Solheim Cup just isn't on the radar.
Of course Golf Channel is all over it as they should be, but regardless of whether they are included on certain cable packages, Golf Channel is still a specialty channel, not unlike Speed, Food Network, or W.www.chapeaunoirgolf.com
-
08-20-2009 02:15 PM #14
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- XXXXXXXXXXXX
- Posts
- 4,215
Of course this is typical media coverage of ladies professional golf. Rarely do you see major articles in the press when it comes to the LPGA. Same thing goes for network coverage.
It is a shame that the LPGA gets treated like this. I have been to two LPGA events in London and both were great to watch.
As the commercial says "These Ladies Rock"
My opinions are my own, I do not follow others.
-
08-20-2009 06:02 PM #15
Typical media coverage is only typical because it is a reflection of what we want to read and what we want to watch. It's an unfortunate function of the media. Happily, the internet and specialty tv now provides makes things such as women's professional golf more accessible.
If anything, I personally would take issue with the LPGA Tour and how that organization has failed to capitalize more positively on the exploits of some very talented players of the last 20 years. Since Ty Votaw left, and Bivens took over (and was subsequently ushered out the door this summer), the LPGA Tour has been hemmoraging tournaments due to a lack of sponsors.
Bivens was an outright disaster as commissioner, drawing hard lines when it came to demands from long-standing sponsors (McDonald's to name just one), and created ridiculous gaps in the tour's playing schedule that left most guessing as to when the next tournament was. Blaming mainstream media for a lack of LPGA coverage fails to take the internal problems of the LPGA and how they have chosen to conduct business into account.
The LPGA will get it's due when, as an organization, they've earned it, and when the masses really begin to care about womens' sport as much as they do mens.www.chapeaunoirgolf.com
-
08-20-2009 07:21 PM #16
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- Ottawa
- Posts
- 1,076
This ^ is what it boils down to.
Men hit it farther. They wedge it better. They chip better. They putt better (which I always found strange...thought that a "woman's touch" would help with putting ). Is it any wonder the men's game is more popular?
It's like trying to compare women's hockey with the NHL.
-
08-20-2009 08:06 PM #17
Your comments intrigued me so I decided to check the stats for the PGA Tour and the LPGA. The stats support some of your contentions and may undermine others. Unfortunately, the LPGA does not publish detailed stats like the PGA. However, there is enough information available to make some comparisons.
1. Driving Distance. I did not bother looking at this closely, since it is clearly obvious that the men bang it out much further than the women. What may surprise more than a few on this site is that the top women players would bang it past most good amateur players with ease.
2. Driving Accuracy. The women have it hands down on the men in this regard. The top 16 women hit from .834 to .759 of the fairways. The top 16 men range from .7393 to 6998. The lesson for us may be that unless you can hit the ball at PGA Tour distances there is a real advantage to staying in the fairway. BCMist will attest to this, I am sure.
3. Green in Regulation. Here too, the women have an advantage over the men. The numbers for the top 16 women ranges from .761 to .700. The top 16 men hit from .7107 to .6827 of their targets.
4. Putts per round. The men have an advantage here. The top 11 women take from 28.170 to 28.920 putts per round. The men, by comparison, range from 27.64 to 28.36.
5. Putts Per Greens Hit. Here the stats are surprisingly comparable. The top 16 women average from 1.74 to 1.77 per green hit. The same number of men, from 1.721 to 1.742. This tells me that the women are damn good with the flat stick.
6. Sand Saves. One stat that demonstrates a remarkable advantage for the men is sand saves. Here the top 16 men get it up and down from 67.86 to 58.10 percent of the time. The women average from 58.8 to 50 percent of their tries.
All of that said, I'll be glued to the tube in the next three days watching these matches. I'll enjoy myself and learn a lot about how the game should be played.
-
08-20-2009 02:39 PM #18
womens golf is boring!!!! it does nothing for me
willy
email change to [EMAIL="depe.juneja@gmail.com"]depe.juneja@gmail.com[/EMAIL]
-
08-20-2009 02:52 PM #19
-
08-20-2009 05:51 PM #20
I'd agree with this, with the caveat that women's golf on TV is boring.
Women's golf in person, is great. I've been the see the professional ladies all three times they've come here to Ottawa. They are tremendous ambassadors of the game, are far more accessible than their male counterparts, and have games to which most men can more readily relate, distance wise, and therefore, course management wise.www.chapeaunoirgolf.com
-
08-21-2009 03:55 PM #21
- Join Date
- Feb 2004
- Posts
- 4,163
-
08-22-2009 10:02 PM #22
-
08-20-2009 03:19 PM #23
that might have something to do with it
but in all honesty, i'm more impressed by 8i going 200 yards so I like mens golf. Watching womens golf is like playing golf with indiowilly
email change to [EMAIL="depe.juneja@gmail.com"]depe.juneja@gmail.com[/EMAIL]
-
08-20-2009 03:31 PM #24
Watch it. That's my golf partner you're talking about!
If length is the only thing that draws you to golf, then I can understand your feelings. I think that you are missing out on a lot of the game's nuances, but that is a topic for another thread. For myself, I think that these women can play amazing and exciting golf. More to the point, I think that the competition will be riveting. Besides, I always learn a lot about strategy and mechanics watching them play, since my game is a lot more comparable in terms of distance to theirs than it is to the sluggers on the PGA Tour.
-
08-21-2009 09:12 PM #25
I'm with Mpare on this one......those ladies can play.
I'll even raise him by saying that the vast majority of 'us' would be better served by trying to emulate the swings of the LPGA players as opposed to the PGA players.
Give me the long silky smooth swing of a professional lady golfer and I'd die a happy man
-
08-20-2009 07:24 PM #26
agreed, womens hockey also sucks
willy
email change to [EMAIL="depe.juneja@gmail.com"]depe.juneja@gmail.com[/EMAIL]
-
08-20-2009 07:34 PM #27
Now that we're done bashing women's sports, how 'bout that Solheim Cup eh!
www.chapeaunoirgolf.com
-
08-20-2009 07:42 PM #28
We're a shallow gender. But we are what we are.
Donny Vantage NFL Guru, since 1974
Money won is twice as sweet as money earned
-
08-20-2009 08:08 PM #29
Great post Mike!
Life dinnae come wit gimmies so yuv got nae chance o' gitt'n any from me.
-
08-20-2009 08:13 PM #30
Not really Dan. The top 16 hardly gives the true impression. I'd be interested in the top 100, that would be more indicative.
Donny Vantage NFL Guru, since 1974
Money won is twice as sweet as money earned
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
U.S. draws even at Solheim Cup
By Kilroy in forum Tour TalkReplies: 0Last Post: 09-24-2011, 03:10 PM -
Wie savours the Solheim Cup
By Kilroy in forum Tour TalkReplies: 6Last Post: 08-25-2009, 09:10 PM -
Americans retain Solheim Cup
By Kilroy in forum Tour TalkReplies: 0Last Post: 08-24-2009, 09:40 AM -
U.S., Europe tied at Solheim Cup
By Kilroy in forum Tour TalkReplies: 0Last Post: 08-24-2009, 09:40 AM -
Solheim Cup
By Golfbum in forum Tour TalkReplies: 11Last Post: 09-13-2005, 08:28 AM