+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Frequency

  1. #1
    Singles Match Play Champ 2011 John is on a distinguished road John's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    6,199

    Frequency

    Hey all, i'm thinking of reshafting my irons with the Royal Precision Tour Flighted iron shafts. Now on the Golfworks site they talk about the iron shafts coming in different frequency's. I love and am an avid golfer but can't say I have any idea what kind of frequency I should be playing in my shaft. I'm going to have the clubs at plus one inch as well so if i'm playing a rifle 5.5 now should I go to a 6 if i'm having them tipped an inch long. Let me know what to think guys.
    Thanks
    John

  2. #2
    Golf Canada Rules Official L4 BC MIST is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    4,163
    Quote Originally Posted by John
    Hey all, i'm thinking of reshafting my irons with the Royal Precision Tour Flighted iron shafts. Now on the Golfworks site they talk about the iron shafts coming in different frequency's. I love and am an avid golfer but can't say I have any idea what kind of frequency I should be playing in my shaft. I'm going to have the clubs at plus one inch as well so if i'm playing a rifle 5.5 now should I go to a 6 if i'm having them tipped an inch long. Let me know what to think guys.
    Thanks
    John
    I just took a 5.5 Rifle shaft, a 255 g tip weight, which would simulate a 5 iron and measured the frequency at 38." (324 cpm) I them made this "club" 1" longer and the frequency was (314 cpm).

    Now the standard difference between a 5.5 and a 6.5 rifle is 10 cpm, therefore it seems that you should go to a 6.5 and not a 6.0. The confusing part of your statement above is that you are having the shafts "tipped" an inch long. Do you mean that literally 1" is coming off the tip, which would make them stiffer, and then having them butt trimmed 1" longer? An inch off the tip does not equal an extra inch left on the butt.

    Perhaps you just mean that they are being trimmed to length, 1" longer, which means that less is being taken off the butt than normal.

    Amazing how something simple can become increasingly complicated.

  3. #3
    Singles Match Play Champ 2011 John is on a distinguished road John's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Ottawa
    Posts
    6,199
    Quote Originally Posted by BC MIST
    I just took a 5.5 Rifle shaft, a 255 g tip weight, which would simulate a 5 iron and measured the frequency at 38." (324 cpm) I them made this "club" 1" longer and the frequency was (314 cpm).

    Now the standard difference between a 5.5 and a 6.5 rifle is 10 cpm, therefore it seems that you should go to a 6.5 and not a 6.0. The confusing part of your statement above is that you are having the shafts "tipped" an inch long. Do you mean that literally 1" is coming off the tip, which would make them stiffer, and then having them butt trimmed 1" longer? An inch off the tip does not equal an extra inch left on the butt.

    Perhaps you just mean that they are being trimmed to length, 1" longer, which means that less is being taken off the butt than normal.

    Amazing how something simple can become increasingly complicated.

    Sorry I just meant to say that they are being left at an inch longer in the butt end. I shouldn't have mentioned anything about them being tipped...

  4. #4
    3 Wood mkemila is on a distinguished road mkemila's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    225
    My God.....confusing is an understatement.....are there any sites out there that cover basic frequency matching on different shaft types. I have considered going to a rifle shaft on my Hogans and do not want to make a move until I completely understand what I am about to do to myself......


    Quote Originally Posted by BC MIST
    I just took a 5.5 Rifle shaft, a 255 g tip weight, which would simulate a 5 iron and measured the frequency at 38." (324 cpm) I them made this "club" 1" longer and the frequency was (314 cpm).

    Now the standard difference between a 5.5 and a 6.5 rifle is 10 cpm, therefore it seems that you should go to a 6.5 and not a 6.0. The confusing part of your statement above is that you are having the shafts "tipped" an inch long. Do you mean that literally 1" is coming off the tip, which would make them stiffer, and then having them butt trimmed 1" longer? An inch off the tip does not equal an extra inch left on the butt.

    Perhaps you just mean that they are being trimmed to length, 1" longer, which means that less is being taken off the butt than normal.

    Amazing how something simple can become increasingly complicated.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. WTB: Frequency Analyzer
    By stone_bone in forum Components & Tools
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-14-2012, 12:22 PM
  2. Frequency Meter
    By mysticalwarrior in forum Components & Tools
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-05-2010, 08:49 PM
  3. Frequency Analyzer
    By kubi in forum Components & Tools
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-13-2009, 09:17 PM
  4. Frequency meter
    By sirgolfsalot in forum Club Making & Components
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-12-2008, 04:38 PM
  5. WTB: Frequency Meter
    By Shorthitter in forum Components & Tools
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-27-2007, 06:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts