+ Reply to Thread
Results 31 to 60 of 126
Thread: English Mandatory on the LPGA
-
08-26-2008 06:14 PM #31
How many languages were spoken at the Olympics? Did competitors need to speak English to excel in their sport?
It's not an office where you need to communicate with your co-workers. Just your coach or caddie. Perhaps a translator for interviews. It has worked pretty well in the past.Life dinnae come wit gimmies so yuv got nae chance o' gitt'n any from me.
-
08-26-2008 06:16 PM #32
Quite apart from the ham-fisted manner in which the LPGA has crafted this policy (wouldn't it have been better to "encourage" players to learn English), it sends the wrong message internationally. If the LPGA has any intention of expanding their market beyond the limited boundaries of the USA, this policy will hardly assist them in that regard.
-
08-26-2008 06:17 PM #33
-
08-26-2008 06:18 PM #34
-
08-26-2008 06:29 PM #35
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- around here
- Posts
- 2,102
Since we are talking about US law:
http://www.las-elc.org/LanguageDiscrimination.pdf
-
08-26-2008 06:39 PM #36
-
08-26-2008 06:40 PM #37
The second section "is language discrimination illegal" is decidedly vague language discrimination, stating that many (not all) courts consider language discrimination to be a form of racial or ethnic discrimination. So, no, that is not a specific law against language discrimination, but a suggesting that some courts consider it an ethnic/racial matter. That would be decidedly difficult to prove in court as the LPGA has many players who are of different races/ethnicities bu also speak english.
-
08-26-2008 07:01 PM #38
I could easily see some rich dude start his own Professionnal Ladies of Golf (PLG) and get lots of the actual sponsors to follow. Evian, Corona, China Air, Ricoh, Mizuno, Sony, Honda, etc... could easily be sponsors of the new PLG and maybe Dan Kilbank would be the first President of the new Association.
Mr Kilbank addressing the media: "Welcome to the PLG, our motto is only the best. We don't care where you come from and what language you speak we want the best player in our Association."
The LPGA is committing suicide, they should know there is a lot more money outside the US than in the US. It is pretty small thinking that if they don't speak english they don't have any sponsorship. Lorena Ochea is a big star in Mexico and believe me she has lots of sponsors... and not because she speaks english.If you think it's hard to meet new people, try picking up the wrong golf ball.
-
08-26-2008 07:43 PM #39
I find it interesting that the LPGA's site doesn't appear to have posted anything about this policy. Amazing! More amazing is the fact that one of the "players" featured in their players' section is Michelle Wie. Maybe it won't matter if you get bounced from the tour for being unable to speak English, so long as you can generate exceptional gate numbers. Come to think of it, maybe you don't ever have to be a member of the tour, if you can generate sufficient gate.
-
08-26-2008 07:56 PM #40When applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
08-26-2008 08:16 PM #41
Again, as I have stated, I don't think it's a good policy. I think it's absolutely inane. But that doesn't mean that it is discriminatory or illegal in nature...that's all I'm trying to say.
-
08-26-2008 08:31 PM #42
Unlike the Men's tourThe LPGA tour continues to struggle to attract sponsors with deep pockets and /or long term commitment. This is the entertainment business and the tour recognizes a problem.A large contingent cannot communicate with North American pre$$.
However indignant you may get toward an policy requiring oral proficiency in a particular language, lets be honest, the only language we're talking here is $$$ and that is what drives the tour. The South Koreans, Vietnamese etc. will learn English because they here for the $$$. Funny enough those who stand to will benefit the most are those whose"rights"are being defended here. Better communication leading to bigger purses and more lucrative endorsements.
-
08-26-2008 08:34 PM #43
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- around here
- Posts
- 2,102
-
08-26-2008 08:34 PM #44
One thing that seems to be going unmentioned here is the issue of pro-ams - I think I heard that the cost to enter the Wednesday LPGA pro-am at Hunt Club this year was 3K per team. I could be wrong about the dollar amount, but the point is, who wants to shell out that kind of cash to play in a pro-am with a player who doesn't speak a word of English?
Al Gore didn't invent the internet, but he did invent global warming.
-
08-26-2008 08:44 PM #45
It is discriminatory, though, because it shows favouritism towards a certain subset of people based on a skill that has no bearing on their ability to do the job.
If you were fired from your job for not being able to speak Swahili, or for not being able to tango, it would be the exact same issue. The fact you can learn to speak Swahili or to do the tango is immaterial - your employer has no grounds to make those skills a requirement and deny you employment for not possessing them.
The correct thing for the LPGA to have done would have been to offer language tutoring and incentives to learn English - it accomplishes the same task without the uproar, moral outrage, and inevitable tarnishing of their brand image.Wannabe Golf
-
08-26-2008 08:53 PM #46
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- around here
- Posts
- 2,102
I think the "entertainment" in sports is provided by the athlete's play and not by their interviews. Heck, many English-speaking athletes choose to not speak to the press.
Besides, I don't think anyone is debating about the benefits of learning English when you are playing on a tour that is conducted largely in the United States. I'm sure most of the South Korean players would even agree with that. The problem is when you may it a requirement - one that largely affects only one or two ethnic groups - and then prohibit athletes from playing based on that requirement.
-
08-26-2008 08:55 PM #47
There is precedent in US law...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based upon national origin and race. Some courts and governmental agencies have said that discrimination based on language is a form of national origin discrimination because primary language is closely related to the place a person comes from. So if you are being discriminated against for using that language, or because of characteristics having to do with that language, that is considered essentially the same as if you were being discriminated against because of your national origin.
As well, text from the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms...
22. Nothing in sections 16 to 20 abrogates or derogates from any legal or customary right or privilege acquired or enjoyed either before or after the coming into force of this Charter with respect to any language that is not English or French.When applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
08-26-2008 08:55 PM #48based on a skill that has no bearing on their ability to do the job.
who wants to shell out that kind of cash to play in a pro-am with a player who doesn't speak a word of English? .
-
08-26-2008 09:09 PM #49
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Atlantic Canada
- Posts
- 80
-
08-26-2008 09:19 PM #50
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Location
- around here
- Posts
- 2,102
...just like its Sean Avery's job to market the NHL and Barry Bond's job to be accessible to fans in order to grow the game of baseball!
C'mon, we're talking about athletes here. Their only job is to play their sport to the best of their ability. It would be great if they're also approachable, thoughtful, courteous, well-spoken, photogenic and just a genuinely nice person - but that is hardly a requirement for their work.
-
08-26-2008 09:23 PM #51When applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
08-26-2008 09:23 PM #52
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- Ottawa
- Posts
- 1,076
EXACTLY !!! The old saying on the professional tours is, "Wednesday is the day we pay the bills." ie., the day that the players repay the sponsors for their investment in whatever tour they play on.
If you are the CEO of Safeway...and you bring in your three best distributors...and you get Meena Lee in your group and she can't speak a damn word of English...what the hell is the point of the day? These guys spend a lot of money to sponsor golf tournaments, and the LPGA is simply trying to help the sponsors get more bang for their buck.
-
08-26-2008 09:27 PM #53
Too bad nobody else seems to "get it."
Really... so Paula Creamer went to Golf last week to promote the LPGA... You don't get it. She went there to promote Taylor Made and Paula Creamer. She went because she was getting paid.
Players JOB IS NOT to promote the LPGA. The LPGA is happy if they do but they don't have to.
Only the best player should be there not the 400th rank player because she speaks english. By the way Edith Bunker, LPGA member rank 554th will be at Rideau Centre this week-end... wonder how many people will show up.
A player rank in the top 10 (who don't speak english) could stand at the Rideau Centre for 2 hours and sign autograph without saying a word and smile and everybody would be happy.If you think it's hard to meet new people, try picking up the wrong golf ball.
-
08-26-2008 09:33 PM #54
So they should put "language preference" on the pro-am application form?
They're all so altruistic in their endeavor. What a load of crap! They want to improve their "street cred" around the office/boardroom, and hopefully get a bunch of photos taken with a "hottie in a skirt" who just happens to be able to play golf. It's all about their own exposure and nothing else.When applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
08-26-2008 09:36 PM #55
- Join Date
- May 2003
- Location
- Ottawa
- Posts
- 1,076
You don't get it. When you play on a tour, you represent that Tour. There are codes of conduct, both on and off the golf course, that you must adhere to, that are written in pages and pages of bylaws. Don't think that this is strictly an "independent contractor" issue. It's much broader than that.
-
08-26-2008 09:40 PM #56
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Location
- Atlantic Canada
- Posts
- 80
-
08-26-2008 09:44 PM #57
Bottom line is, this language issue will end up in US Federal Court, and the LPGA will lose.
When applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
08-26-2008 09:45 PM #58
I'm failing to see how it is anyone's "Right" to play golf on the LPGA and how that supposed "Right" some how superceeds the LPGA's right to make rules which govern its association.
Anyway this is a fruitless discussion as the PCers will never be able to see or accept the rational behind the LPGA's decision.
One final point though............do you really think that they would propose such a rule without first getting a legal opinion and then getting a second opinion on that original opinion??
You can quote all as many passages from the US or Canadian constitution as you like, but I'm sure the LPGA has elicited the opinions of constitutional law experts and are quite confident in their decision despite what all of the lawyer wannabes might think
-
08-26-2008 09:47 PM #59
-
08-26-2008 09:47 PM #60
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
LPGA players weigh in on English-only policy
By Kilroy in forum Tour TalkReplies: 10Last Post: 09-11-2008, 05:42 PM -
LPGA Backs down from English Speaking Requirements
By quinner in forum Tour TalkReplies: 56Last Post: 09-07-2008, 07:52 PM -
LPGA Tour's English-only policy draws criticism from players
By Kilroy in forum Tour TalkReplies: 0Last Post: 08-28-2008, 07:00 PM -
LPGA's English-speaking mandate blasted
By Kilroy in forum Tour TalkReplies: 0Last Post: 08-28-2008, 07:00 PM -
Speak English, says LPGA
By Kilroy in forum Tour TalkReplies: 12Last Post: 08-27-2008, 11:27 AM