PCS question

[Chieflongtee]

How long can you host the PCS logo if you are no longer a member?

[Kilroy]

When I was a pro photographer I had a membership in the Professional Photographers of Ontario (and Quebec) along with accreditations. Once a member left the association they we were not allowed to use the logo or the accreditation at all.

[Chieflongtee]

What if they did?

[Chieflongtee]

Found out the answer:



The PCS Logo Rules of Use specify that the PCS Logo MUST appear with the certified person's name and their certification level - like on the bottom of our home page - however you will see it used all the time without anything other than the logo.

So this alone does not cut it:

[sammypvt]

what is this thread all about, who is the question to.

[Chieflongtee]

what is this thread all about, who is the question to.

It means that a lot of folks out there are using the logo on their website when in fact they don't have the right to. If you have passed the certification or were a member at one point you are allowed to post a copy of your certification. If one is no longer a member then the PCS logo should be removed from their website.

[Big Johnny69]

It means that a lot of folks out there are using the logo on their website when in fact they don't have the right to. If you have passed the certification or were a member at one point you are allowed to post a copy of your certification. If one is no longer a member then the PCS logo should be removed from their website.

Not sure why this interests you so much. You are a hobbyist, what relevance does this have to you? And if you are concerned with someone posting credentials, why not take it up with them personally? Why air this out in a public forum? Perhaps they aren't aware of the length of time they are allowed to post a simple logo. Could just be an honest mistake.

[danscustom]

People make decisions (and spend money) based on what they see in the credentials of a proclaimed expert. The PCS is a dues based Society and built on integrity.
If you are not a member, you should not have the right to advertise that you are. This is false pretence and you are claiming a credit that you are not entiltled to.
If I went and spent money at a shop that claims to be PCS and they are not, I would be ticked.

[Big Johnny69]

People make decisions (and spend money) based on what they see in the credentials of a proclaimed expert. The PCS is a dues based Society and built on integrity.
If you are not a member, you should not have the right to advertise that you are. This is false pretence and you are claiming a credit that you are not entiltled to.
If I went and spent money at a shop that claims to be PCS and they are not, I would be ticked.

I'm not saying that. I'm saying, perhaps at one time they were a member of the PCS and have not updated/removed the logo from their website since they've no longer been a member. If you're not the webmaster, updating your website sometimes get neglected or overlooked if you're busy with your business. All I'm saying is a simple "Are you member of the PCS? It says so on your website." as a reminder.

[Kilroy]

True Geoff, but it should be a priority for such people. Besides, it was just a question, I did not see anyone called out on the issue here. That would be inapropriate. It should be taken up privately with the individual, and if that doesn't work then PCS should be notified. It's up to them to deal with it.

[Big Johnny69]

True Geoff, but it should be a priority for such people. Besides, it was just a question, I did not see anyone called out on the issue here. That would be inapropriate. It should be taken up privately with the individual, and if that doesn't work then PCS should be notified. It's up to them to deal with it.

I agree Dan. But if you're not sure of someone's credentials, then ask them. Or seek out the answer from the PCS. That's all I'm saying. Think about it, why else would someone ask this question, then post their response the way they did unless they were planning/trying to call someone out? The matter should be taken up privately.

[Kilroy]

I agree. Let's not jump the gun though, since that was not done.

[Big Johnny69]

I agree. Let's not jump the gun though, since that was not done.

Agreed. I apologize Chief, Dan and Dan if I jumped the gun a bit on this one.

[Kilroy]

If I went and spent money at a shop that claims to be PCS and they are not, I would be ticked.

I also agree with this statement.

[Chieflongtee]

Not sure why this interests you so much. You are a hobbyist, what relevance does this have to you? And if you are concerned with someone posting credentials, why not take it up with them personally? Why air this out in a public forum? Perhaps they aren't aware of the length of time they are allowed to post a simple logo. Could just be an honest mistake.

Exactly. It is a public forum therefore the public domain has the right to know these things. I have the right to ask questions(I think) and really do not appreciate you coming at me like this. I have my interests you have yours. Do I go and ask you what your interests are everytime you post something.

[Kilroy]

Easy there Chief, he just apologised. Please cut him some slack.

[Big Johnny69]

Exactly. It is a public forum therefore the public domain has the right to know these things. I have the right to ask questions(I think) and really do not appreciate you coming at me like this. I have my interests you have yours. Do I go and ask you what your interests are everytime you post something.

Fair enough Chief. But I guess you missed my apology. I was just reading more into it than what was there.

[danscustom]

Agreed. I apologize Chief, Dan and Dan if I jumped the gun a bit on this one.

Hey, I'm fine with everything. Your right about web updates. As a loyal PCS guy myself there is a code to abide by and there are benefits with being a member. But, you got to be a member to claim those rights.

[The Saint]

This is where it should have stopped. Bottom line is that Chief found his answer.
If there are people advertising the PCS logo that aren't members then that's another issue. IMHO, exposing them is a not an issue to be discussed in this forum and should be dealt with offline.

It means that a lot of folks out there are using the logo on their website when in fact they don't have the right to. If you have passed the certification or were a member at one point you are allowed to post a copy of your certification. If one is no longer a member then the PCS logo should be removed from their website.

[Kilroy]

This is where it should have stopped. Bottom line is that Chief found his answer.
If there are people advertising the PCS logo that aren't members then that's another issue. IMHO, exposing them is a not an issue to be discussed in this forum and should be dealt with offline.

I agree the question has been asked and answered I feel that this subject if it needs to be pursued further should be taken to PCS.

Closed.