Closed Thread
Results 91 to 120 of 143
-
08-25-2005 10:52 AM #91Originally Posted by broken27
Buying out someone's contract is the VERY, VERY, VERY last resort - only to be used for someone who, for whatever reason, is untradeable. It is basically a strategy used to cut your losses rather juggle your lineup. You write a cheque for a few million dollars and get absolutely NOTHING - except the opportunity to spend even more money replacing the guy you just bought out (hopefully at a cheaper price, but still). All you're doing is throwing money at your problems instead of solving them.
Players don't get fired in the NHL - they get traded. When you fire someone you're on the hook for severence pay - which is what buying out someone's contract really is. No respectable accountant running a modern NHL team is going to pay millions in severence pay if he can simply transfer the salary to someone else.
Nolan is probably untradeable and a good candidate for a buyout. He's old, injured and has a huge contract. Belfour is not untradeable, and neither was DeVries (obviously) or anyone else on the Senators team. There will be a lot more trades happening between now and training camp as teams adjust to "make their number".[COLOR=green][B]Golf is a game invented by the same people who think music comes out of bagpipes.[/B][/COLOR]
-
08-25-2005 11:11 AM #92
El Tigre,
You are right but I think Belfour is also untradable. He is 40 and has a sore back. How bad could it get for a goalie.
You might be able to trade Belfour at the trading deadline for a team who nneds a goalie and has room under the cap.
I really don't have a clue what the Leafs were thinking. Actually I don't know what they have been thinking for the last 30 years....lol
Chambo
-
08-25-2005 11:14 AM #93
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Gatineau
- Posts
- 346
Old= Hasek, can he pull it off this year. I haven't read this entire thread so I don't know if this has already been talked about, but I think we need a new goalie, someone like Luango.
-
08-25-2005 11:25 AM #94"Richard"Guest
Alot more players should have been bought out than actaully where. If you can go ahead and get a fresh start by writting a few checks you might as well, its better off then being screwed for the next 2-3 years while jugling a line up and getting used to the new CBA
-
08-25-2005 11:26 AM #95Originally Posted by flagolfnutStrive for perfection, but never expect it!
-
08-25-2005 11:32 AM #96
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- Gatineau
- Posts
- 346
That would be sweet!! Because I think next year we'll definetly need a goalie
-
08-25-2005 11:41 AM #97"Richard"Guest
Ottawa should offer Roberto a 6 year 30 mil contract. He might not be worth that much in the first few years of the contract but a goalie like that, you want him down for a long term deal. He will make more than that over the next 6 years though in the NHL...
Last edited by "Richard"; 08-25-2005 at 12:10 PM.
-
08-25-2005 12:03 PM #98Ty WebbGuest
I, personally, have always liked Heatley. Despite making some mistakes (didn't Bonk (a czech) once get nailed for impaired while being stuck on a snowbank), he is a good kid. What is more important is team chemistry. Certain players click well together. Remember the line Wendel Clarke first played on in Toronto? Ottawa, in my opinion, has always lacked this chemistry.
Maybe, mardi gras in the stands is the answer.
PS Broken27 should change his name to BrokenRecord.
-
08-25-2005 12:24 PM #99Originally Posted by Ty Webb
As for Eltigre:
COMPLIANCE RULES
Will Clubs have an opportunity to make off-season adjustments to their rosters to come into compliance with the new CBA rules?
Yes. Clubs will have a one-time opportunity, during a six-day period, to exercise buy-outs of existing player contracts. Amounts paid to players pursuant to these compliance buy-outs will not be counted against a club's upper limit or the League-wide players' share. Clubs that choose to exercise compliance buy-outs must pay the buy-out amount over the remaining term of the contract.
-----------------
So, Toronto missed the boat on buying these guys out. Your assertion that it is a last resort move is only partly correct. A player has to agree to being bought out under normal circumstances, and it counts against the cap. A guy like Belfour won't do it. So, to get rid of his contract (which by any standard would have been a good idea), they would have had to exercise the buyout option "special period" that was granted post-CBA ratification.
Neither Nolan or Belfour has much value on the trade market really, both because of age, contract and injury concerns. They may be able to parlay those guys into a couple of draft picks, but even then, they missed out on a really lucrative FA market this season. The reality is that JFJ is likely trying to align himself for NEXT year's free agency market and has already thrown in the towel on this season. Next year, the age for unrestricted free agency drops (to 29 I think), and there should be some "younger" FA talent available. With Toronto's lack of a development system, this might be a good short-term fix to get some mid-age players into the lineup.
My money management skills are okay eltigre, but unfortunately your scenario of buying out Nolan now is not likely. Any buyouts made now count directly against the cap.
Cheers,
Dan[URL=http://www.sportsfiend.ca/]Sportsfiend.ca - Make You Opinion Into News...
-
08-25-2005 12:31 PM #100"Richard"Guest
My cousin lives in FLA and he just told me that there is a rumor he just heard. FLA is going to sign Roberto Luongo to an extension ontop of his current year for 6 years 35million and trade him to ottawa for Redden and hasek....
If there is any truth to this and I was ottawa I would get this done before FLA changed their mind, not give them any time to realize what a horrible trade this is for them. Anyway, anyone else hear anything? I know there are usually 20 different rumors floating around about the same player but still, fun to speculate
-
08-25-2005 12:41 PM #101
Well, Luongo just took a big hit with a $3.2M arbitrator awarded 1-year contract. He's not going to be happy about this... Trade to Ottawa for Hasek and Redden would be hilarious. As much as I love Hasek, the idea of likely the best young netminder in the NHL playing in Ottawa after the La-lean years is kind of neat.
Haven't seen or heard anything about it, though. None of the hockey boards are abuzz with this the way they normally get. Who knows...
Dan[URL=http://www.sportsfiend.ca/]Sportsfiend.ca - Make You Opinion Into News...
-
08-25-2005 12:45 PM #102Originally Posted by broken27
-
08-25-2005 12:52 PM #103
WOW! This is bad news for Theo in MTL. My guess is that he was waiting for this arbitration decision to sit down with Bob. Now that he knows what arbitration will do to him he will probably sign lower with MTL.
I heard a rumour a few weeks back about a trade between MTL and FLA. Theo and Luongo and other players.
I was sure Luongo would have been a URFA next year but its not the case. He may what to be traded!!Strive for perfection, but never expect it!
-
08-25-2005 01:04 PM #104Originally Posted by broken27
Belfour is a different story. His injuries are not as bad, and when he is healthy he is still one of the top goaltenders in the league. Given that the Leaf's defence sucks and they are one of the most penalized teams in the league (and we'll be seeing a lot more power plays this year), they'll need a top-notch goaltender to have ANY hope of making the playoffs. Keeping him is not a bad gamble, and they could certainly get more than a couple of draft picks for him in a trade. Depending on how the season goes, they might move him at the trade deadline.[COLOR=green][B]Golf is a game invented by the same people who think music comes out of bagpipes.[/B][/COLOR]
-
08-25-2005 01:12 PM #105Originally Posted by el tigreStrive for perfection, but never expect it!
-
08-25-2005 01:21 PM #106Originally Posted by Reid Masson[COLOR=green][B]Golf is a game invented by the same people who think music comes out of bagpipes.[/B][/COLOR]
-
08-25-2005 01:26 PM #107"Richard"Guest
what did bonk do? Also, what is a good site for me to look at team salaries and cap space and free agents still available
-
08-25-2005 01:30 PM #108Originally Posted by thothoStrive for perfection, but never expect it!
-
08-25-2005 01:32 PM #109Originally Posted by thotho
www.thefourthperiod.com - provides everything you're looking for in an easy-to-navigate format.
Plus Dan has his hand in it, so you know the coverage is unbiased
-
08-25-2005 01:38 PM #110Originally Posted by el tigre
Dan[URL=http://www.sportsfiend.ca/]Sportsfiend.ca - Make You Opinion Into News...
-
08-25-2005 01:41 PM #111"Richard"Guest
is there a min and max number of people you can have on your roster this year???
-
08-25-2005 01:42 PM #112
So, how long do you figure before Luongo demands a trade?
When applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
08-25-2005 01:44 PM #113"Richard"Guest
Also whats going on with marc andre fluery? how much is he going to make and why isn't he on the PIT list at
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/feature.asp?fid=6926
-
08-25-2005 01:47 PM #114Originally Posted by thothoStrive for perfection, but never expect it!
-
08-25-2005 01:51 PM #115"Richard"Guest
Wasn't he picked first overall and sopposed to be the next patrick roy??
-
08-25-2005 01:51 PM #116Originally Posted by thotho
(a) For the 1995/96 League Year and thereafter there shall be a maximum of 24 players on each Club's Playing Roster at any one time, provided, that in the event the NHL expands to 28 or more Clubs, the NHL will have the option, at its sole discretion, to reduce the maximum Playing Roster of each Club to 23, commencing with the League year in which such expansion team(s) begin playing, provided, however, that, on the date of each season's trade deadline, a Club's Playing Roster may be increased to any number of players the Club, in its discretion, so determines. There shall be no
reduction of the required minimum Playing Rosters of the Clubs, except in case of emergency, below eighteen skaters and two goalkeepers.
That's from the old CBA, but you can be fairly safe in assuming the minimum of 23 is still the same. Lowest it could go is 20 (4 lines, 6D, 2G)...
Dan[URL=http://www.sportsfiend.ca/]Sportsfiend.ca - Make You Opinion Into News...
-
08-25-2005 01:53 PM #117Originally Posted by LobWedge
I don’t know but one think I don’t get. When you are a RFA you are allowed to receive offers from other teams. The team that owns you must match the highest qualified offer if they want to keep him. Does this mean that nobody has offered anything major for Roberto. That’s crazy.Strive for perfection, but never expect it!
-
08-25-2005 01:57 PM #118Originally Posted by thothoStrive for perfection, but never expect it!
-
08-25-2005 02:13 PM #119
Give Luongo a half-decent team in front of him and he wins twice as many games as he loses. IMO with the equipment changes for goalies this year, he will be one of the guys that will be able to adjust easily (ala Brodeur, Theodore, Hasek) because he's a goaltender, not a shot blocker (ala Giguere). His stock will rise as a result and he will be rewarded next season, if he stays focused on the task at hand.
When applying the Rules, you follow them line by line. You don't read between them.
-
08-25-2005 03:00 PM #120
Two words for Nolan and the Leafs "Boo Hoo".
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Heatley gone
By Longball in forum SportsReplies: 61Last Post: 11-22-2009, 10:03 PM -
Heatley
By Mattchew in forum SportsReplies: 15Last Post: 05-08-2008, 09:32 PM -
Dany Heatley
By foxman in forum SportsReplies: 38Last Post: 10-05-2007, 10:12 AM -
heatley-hossa trade article
By jonf in forum SportsReplies: 6Last Post: 01-24-2007, 01:48 PM -
Heatley – Hossa deal
By mberube in forum SportsReplies: 4Last Post: 11-23-2005, 03:36 PM