Printable View
Tiger Woods' streak of victories in stroke-play events, which dated back to July, ended Sunday when Yong-Eun Yang won the $5 million HSBC Champions in the biggest upset of the year. The unheralded Korean drained everything in sight in the middle of his round and held on for a 69, while Woods charged his way to a 67 that left him in second place for the second straight year.
More...
are you posting these news clips to get to 5000 posts faster??
I just thought people would be interested in some posts about GOLF for a change :lmfao
Tiger finishes 2nd again. The sad thing is that along with his earnings and his appearance fee he will likely make 3 or 4 X what the winner made. :thumbsdow Something about that just isn't right in my books.
It is especially not right when the number one golfer on the PGA Tour took a pass on the year end championship to rest up for his cash-dash to China.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Golfbum
how can you guys blame him? Yes tiger has close to 300-400 million dollars but lets say his ap. fee is 2-3 mil, and lets say he thinks he has a better chance of willing the 1m top prize thats almost 4 mil for willing one tourney and 3 for not... thats a lot of money for anyone. I don't see how he can turn that kind of cash down. Its funny because tiger has single handedly toubled/trippled pga purses, brought awareness to his sport, got the pga an awesome TV deal... let him do what he wants... even if it is $$$ that runs that gready *******s life
Tiger is in a SLUMP....you heard it here first!
If the top players on the tour all took Tiger's approach, there would be no tour to speak of. He has a responsibility to the tour and to its sponsors. Admittedly, there may be a lot of factors that we know nothing about, but this kind of pursuit of self-interest is what distinguishes Tiger from the great Arnold Palmer. Arnie knew that it wasn't only about how much money he could grab.
Quote:
Originally Posted by "Richard"
I see what you are saying but I just think that he has done more than his fair share for the game. From what I understand, ryder cup players don't get paid but he still plays there so money doesn't completely run his life but if someone makes you an offer you can refuse... you can blame him for that and truthfully, its not like he skipped a major which for reasons I can't explain would be unforgivable. I'm sure even a 5mil fee wouldn't make him skip it.
Maybe this is a good thing, the NFL, NBA are becoming global leagues, I'm sure tiger isn't playing in china to grow the game but he is doing it. THe game of golf is probably benifiting from him playing in china instead of the states. I personally would like to see the big 5 play more international events but how do they choose which ones? What better way than to pick based on who will pay you more, its as good as any other way of deciding
TGC reporters will say his streak is still alive because this was not a PGA Tour event.
:rolleyes WOW, some pretty strong statements here!
I'm not sure that most of them are purely emotional or tiger hater bating... In my opinion:
1. He doesn't owe the PGA and its' sponsors a thing
2. Nothing wrong with missing the PGA Chamoionship (the richest get richer)
3. Maybe contractually he had no choice but to attend the HSBC tournament
I believe any player that did play in the PGA Championship would have missed it for the appearence fee that Tiger got.
Its a BUSSINESS today folks, like hockey no longer just a game. It would appear that Tiger is a very smart businessman. :thumbsup
In my opinion, the fact that Ames registered and took the $104K lat place money knowing he couldn't play was worse than what Tiger did.... at least Tiger showed up and played for his few million. Ames made a long distance phone call :thumbsdow What about Phil, is he any less 'guilty' because he didn't want to play due to family reasons? Maybe they are both sending a message to the PGA?
That's funny, because the story I posted announcing the end of the streak came from the PGA!Quote:
Originally Posted by rgk5
Now that is an interesting statement! I wonder what Tim Finchem (of whom I am not a fan - let's be clear about that), the rest of the tour players and, most importantly, the sponsors would say? You're right, though, that so long as the analysis is confined to the individual level, he owes nothing to anyone. And, it is equally true that Tiger has had the effect of raising Tour purses. However, my instincts tell me that the PGA Tour has nearly milked sponsors dry without particular regard for their needs and concerns - witness the way the RCGA was treated. On this psychological level, once sponsors come to the conclusion that they are being "screwed" by a group (this includes, most notably, Tiger and Finchem) who care nothing about them, then this econcomic house of cards will crumble. At that point, it will really be every man for himself. No doubt Tiger will make out fine (cats always land on their feet), but the Tour as we know it will be a distant memory.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Indio
Mike, I look at it this way. If the PGA Tour is dependant on Tiger Woods (one man) for the survival of their 'business' and to keep the sponsors revenue pouring in, then they are already in trouble. It speaks of a very watered down product.Quote:
Originally Posted by mpare
Maybe Tiger and The Shark will get together and start their own tour! (Two very smart businessmen) :thumbsup :-)
But on the otherhand, if it wasn't for Tiger being there, the winner would probably be getting 3-4 X less that what he did get.Quote:
Originally Posted by Golfbum
Maybe, maybe not.Quote:
Originally Posted by BigFlopper
But I would bet you on this one. The people in the galleries had to pay more money to watch the tournament because Woods was there. Is that fair?
Not IMO. There was plenty of quality golfers in that event besides Woods. Goosen, Campbell, Donald, Harrington, Casey, Monty, Furyk, the list goes on and on. It was a Euorpean Event, so there was plenty of big name talent there. The sponsors need to recoup that appearance money and they do that off the ticket sales.
A couple of years ago Woods made an appearance at a tourament in New Zealand, where Super Caddie Williams lives. He did it to help promote golf there. Meanwhile he collected a hefty appearance fee which drove up the price of admission to the point that some people could not afford to go watch the event. Some pro's protested that event by not playing. So does his demands for appearance fees hurt or help events?
Rick, in fairness the tournament organizers had the option to say NO, not a penny will be given to you in appearence fees. You said it yourself, there were plenty of GREAT golfers at there yet they still paid Tiger big money to appear. If they are willing to pay, then don't blame Tiger for taking the easy money. I am sure that he did not approach them and say hey, you have a tournament coming up and if you give me 3 million in appearence fees, I will attend. I have a felling it was the other way around, they approached him with the offer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Golfbum
Tiger is doing what is good for tiger and his future. I don't have a problem with that.
I don't hear anyone complaining about the greedy hockey players who have driven the cost of tickets well beyond the reach of many avid hockey fans.
Some people just don't like Tiger and will blame him for every move he makes. :rolleyes
I agree Bob. The tournament organizers did not have to offer Woods a dime. However they did, which in turn drives up the cost to the fans who want to see the rest of the field, along with Woods.Quote:
Originally Posted by Indio
You hit the nail on the head when you said Woods is doing what is good for Woods and his future. Do you honestly think he needs appearance fees with his bank account?
As for hockey players, wait a minute. Same scene as the golf tournament organizers. The "Greedy Owners" were the ones who agreed to multi million dollar contracts for the players. Do you think for one moment that anyone, you or I included would turn down more money if our bosses offered it to us? "No, that's alright Ford Motor Company, I do not want a raise this month. You keep that money" :laughing:
I agree the average fan can no longer afford to take his family to an NHL game. Imagine the costs of taking a family of 5 to watch the Sens? That is a shame when you think about it. I have been to one NHL game, so I am sure not supporting anyone in that league! OHL, different story. I attend a lot of JR B games too, but I get in those for free :-)
So then why is everyone blaming Tiger??? I think you hit the nail on the head as well... the Greedy NHL Owners as well as the Greedy PGA Execitive(s) and the Sponsors..... not Tiger or Phil or anyone else. The only one who Iin my opinion did anything wrong towards the PGA Championship is Stepen Ames..... :rolleyesQuote:
Originally Posted by Golfbum