Originally Posted by
BC MIST
Here is the report of the Romero ruling taken from the USGA website.
Romero's Predicament At No. 11
During Saturday's third round, Eduardo Romero's ball at rest moved on the putting green on the 11th hole. This raised a question whether he had incurred a penalty under Rule 18-2.
No penalty was appropriate under Rule 18-2b. Although Romero had grounded his club 4 to 6 inches behind the ball, he had not yet taken his stance for the stroke and thus had not yet addressed the ball, as is required by that Rule. In this regard, it is important that Romero intended to reset his feet prior to making the stroke, as was his usual practice in such situations (and as he did when he made his next stroke to hole out).
Nor was any penalty appropriate under Rule 18-2a. Although Romero grounded his club, he did not do so directly behind the ball, but rather 4-6 inches away from the ball. Moreover, when he grounded the club, he did so lightly, and the ball did not immediately move. Rather, it did so only a few seconds later. In these circumstances, and given that the ball was on a slope on a firm and fast green made of Poa anua grass with little moisture to help keep it at rest, neither Romero nor his fellow-competitor thought that Romero caused the ball to move.
Interestingly, in watching Appelby on his way to his 59, on the 13th or 14th hole, after missing a putt that left him about 4" from the hole, he grounded his putter about 4" to 5" behind the ball, stood on ONE foot and pushed the ball into the hole without taking a backswing. Had the ball moved before he pushed it into the hole, would he have been penalized? As the principle is the same as the original discussion, I would still say "Yes," as the stance was one from which he intended to play the stroke and because he had grounded the club for the same reason.